Skip to content

Lies, damned lies and epidemiology: why global health needs good epidemiological practice guidelines

Published on:
Authors
S Alba, C Mergenthaler

Epidemiology is the cornerstone of global health. It shapes policy decisions and evidence-based practice by identifying disease risk factors and preventive healthcare targets.

See a report of the Global Myths & Global Risks Public Symposium held at KIT on 18 June 2019!

Most epidemiological findings are genuine and make an important contribution to global health, but some findings are obtained from ill-designed, poorly implemented, inappropriately analysed or selectively reported studies.

These practices in the grey zone between deliberate misconduct (which includes fabrication, falsification and plagiarism) and ideal scientific behaviour are commonly referred to as ‘questionable research practices’

Scientific misconduct and questionable practices have no place in global health as they steer research in the wrong direction, misguide public policy and undermine society’s trust. Studies can and should be conducted according to the highest attainable professional standards. While the reproducibility crisis is complex and multifaceted, guidelines can address part of the problem by facilitating structured and transparent processes. In this article we argue that global health would greatly benefit from adopting its own set of widely endorsed good epidemiological practice (GEP) guidelines.

Related work

  • Good Epidemiological Practice

    • Institute
    • Publication

    These are preliminary guidelines. They were first developed internally by KIT epidemiologists and were then presented to global health experts from all over the world for validation through a Delphi consultation process. We are currently preparing a manuscript summarising the methodology followed and the resulting guidelines. You are free to use these guidelines and we […]